From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932276Ab2GBC6b (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2012 22:58:31 -0400 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:43405 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932148Ab2GBC6a (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2012 22:58:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:18:28 +0200 From: Harald Welte To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] List LGPL (v2 / v2.1) as GPL compatible in license_is_gpl_compatible() Message-ID: <20120701171828.GL6079@prithivi.gnumonks.org> References: <20120531222407.GB5256@prithivi.gnumonks.org> <20120601090003.2f7090c1@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120601090003.2f7090c1@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I'd like to follow-up to this message, as the patch didn't get merged during the last month. It still feels odd to see messages about "LGPL" tainting the kernel. Is this really the intended behaviour? Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)