On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:05:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:48:44 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:

> > The reason I'm doing this is that the lack of a widely available clock
> > API is a considerable pain point for a lot of the stuff I work on and
> > this is the major blocker to just enabling the default implementation on
> > architectures that don't support it already which would be a big step
> > forwards.

> Agreed.  Please submit this patch and we can concentrate on this other
> stuff later.

Perhaps if you give me a couple of hours...