All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
	Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: sdhci: A new flag SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:29:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120704052909.GB2607@aarontestpc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vci45p5h.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>

Add a new flag of SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER to represent if the host
is using a retuning timer for the card inserted.

This flag is set when the host does tuning the first time for the card
and the host's retuning mode is 1. This flag is used afterwards whenever
needs to decide if the host is currently using a retuning timer.

This flag is cleared when the card is removed in sdhci_reinit.

The set/clear of the flag and the start/stop of the retuning timer is
associated with the card's init/remove time, so there is no need to
touch it when the host is to be removed as at that time the card should
have already been removed.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
---
v3:
Change the macro name from SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING_TIMER to
SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER for better description of the flag as suggested
by Chris Ball.

v2:
v1 mistakenly removed the line del_timer_sync(&host->timer) in
sdhci_remove_host, fix this by adding back the code.

 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c  | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
 include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index b0a5629..3ec4182 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -250,8 +250,9 @@ static void sdhci_reinit(struct sdhci_host *host)
 	 * applicable to UHS-I cards. So reset these fields to their initial
 	 * value when card is removed.
 	 */
-	if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300 && host->tuning_count &&
-			host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1) {
+	if (host->flags & SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER) {
+		host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER;
+
 		del_timer_sync(&host->tuning_timer);
 		host->flags &= ~SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
 		host->mmc->max_blk_count =
@@ -1873,6 +1874,7 @@ out:
 	 */
 	if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING) && host->tuning_count &&
 	    (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)) {
+		host->flags |= SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER;
 		mod_timer(&host->tuning_timer, jiffies +
 			host->tuning_count * HZ);
 		/* Tuning mode 1 limits the maximum data length to 4MB */
@@ -1890,10 +1892,10 @@ out:
 	 * try tuning again at a later time, when the re-tuning timer expires.
 	 * So for these controllers, we return 0. Since there might be other
 	 * controllers who do not have this capability, we return error for
-	 * them.
+	 * them. SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER means the host is currently using
+	 * a retuning timer to do the retuning for the card.
 	 */
-	if (err && host->tuning_count &&
-	    host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)
+	if (err && (host->flags & SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER))
 		err = 0;
 
 	sdhci_clear_set_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL, ier);
@@ -2400,7 +2402,6 @@ out:
 int sdhci_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
 {
 	int ret;
-	bool has_tuning_timer;
 
 	if (host->ops->platform_suspend)
 		host->ops->platform_suspend(host);
@@ -2408,16 +2409,14 @@ int sdhci_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
 	sdhci_disable_card_detection(host);
 
 	/* Disable tuning since we are suspending */
-	has_tuning_timer = host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300 &&
-		host->tuning_count && host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1;
-	if (has_tuning_timer) {
+	if (host->flags & SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER) {
 		del_timer_sync(&host->tuning_timer);
 		host->flags &= ~SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
 	}
 
 	ret = mmc_suspend_host(host->mmc);
 	if (ret) {
-		if (has_tuning_timer) {
+		if (host->flags & SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER) {
 			host->flags |= SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
 			mod_timer(&host->tuning_timer, jiffies +
 					host->tuning_count * HZ);
@@ -2468,8 +2467,7 @@ int sdhci_resume_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
 		host->ops->platform_resume(host);
 
 	/* Set the re-tuning expiration flag */
-	if ((host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300) && host->tuning_count &&
-	    (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1))
+	if (host->flags & SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER)
 		host->flags |= SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
 
 	return ret;
@@ -2508,8 +2506,7 @@ int sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/* Disable tuning since we are suspending */
-	if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300 &&
-	    host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1) {
+	if (host->flags & SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER) {
 		del_timer_sync(&host->tuning_timer);
 		host->flags &= ~SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
 	}
@@ -2550,8 +2547,7 @@ int sdhci_runtime_resume_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
 		sdhci_do_enable_preset_value(host, true);
 
 	/* Set the re-tuning expiration flag */
-	if ((host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300) && host->tuning_count &&
-	    (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1))
+	if (host->flags & SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER)
 		host->flags |= SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
@@ -3140,8 +3136,6 @@ void sdhci_remove_host(struct sdhci_host *host, int dead)
 	free_irq(host->irq, host);
 
 	del_timer_sync(&host->timer);
-	if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300)
-		del_timer_sync(&host->tuning_timer);
 
 	tasklet_kill(&host->card_tasklet);
 	tasklet_kill(&host->finish_tasklet);
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
index d989b51..ac83b10 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct sdhci_host {
 #define SDHCI_PV_ENABLED	(1<<8)	/* Preset value enabled */
 #define SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED	(1<<9)	/* SDIO irq enabled */
 #define SDHCI_HS200_NEEDS_TUNING (1<<10)	/* HS200 needs tuning */
+#define SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER (1<<11)	/* Host is using a retuning timer for the card */
 
 	unsigned int version;	/* SDHCI spec. version */
 
-- 
1.7.11.1.3.g4c8a9db


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-04  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-29  8:17 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for tuning stuffs Aaron Lu
2012-06-29  8:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: sdhci: restore host settings when card is removed Aaron Lu
2012-07-04  0:40   ` Chris Ball
2012-06-29  8:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci: A new flag SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING_TIMER Aaron Lu
2012-07-04  0:46   ` Chris Ball
2012-07-04  5:29     ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2012-07-04  7:14       ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: sdhci: A new flag SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER Girish K S
2012-07-09  5:10       ` Philip Rakity
2012-07-10  2:55       ` Chris Ball

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120704052909.GB2607@aarontestpc.amd.com \
    --to=aaron.lu@amd.com \
    --cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakity@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.