From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: introduce haswell_init_clock_gating Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:27:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20120704072758.GA5375@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1341240671-5843-1-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> <1341240671-5843-9-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> <20120703202418.GE5103@phenom.ffwll.local> <4FF38844.6050707@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D866A09A0 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wibhq4 with SMTP id hq4so3693527wib.12 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FF38844.6050707@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: eugeni.dodonov@intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:03:16PM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > On 07/03/12 17:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:51:09AM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > >> This is based on Ivy Bridge clock gating for now, but is subject to > >> changes in the future. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov > > > > This copy of presumeably the ivb clock gate code is missing the changes > > introduce in: > > > > commit 208482232de3590cee4757dfabe5d8cee8c6e626 > > Author: Ben Widawsky > > Date: Fri May 4 18:58:59 2012 -0700 > > > > drm/i915: set IDICOS to medium uncore resources > > > > I guess that's not quite intentional ... > > > > All the previous patches up to here are queued for -next, thanks. > > I thought that this one was specific for Ivy Bridge, so I just skipped it... > > I have not tried setting these settings on Haswell, so I don't know if > it is useful here as well. I'll try later this week to see if there are > any visible effects. Ok, I've merged the patch and took a note that you volunteered for some benchmarking. But the commit message really should have mentioned why this was dropped compared to the ivb clock gating function it was copy&pasted from. I've added a note to that effect. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48