From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: Questions about CTF format
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 10:20:52 -0400
Message-ID: <20120705142052.GA23162__796.42776768214$1341498693$gmane$org@Krystal>
References: <CAEBwSh_OkCZiWJXQrUO3fnLnka3MfTJpa8z0HqxxVFd7CtPqOg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org>
Received: from mail.openrapids.net ([64.15.138.104]
	helo=blackscsi.openrapids.net)
	by ltt.polymtl.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <compudj@mail.openrapids.net>) id 1SmmvO-0005v4-5S
	for lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:20:54 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEBwSh_OkCZiWJXQrUO3fnLnka3MfTJpa8z0HqxxVFd7CtPqOg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/lttng-dev>,
	<mailto:lttng-dev-request@lists.lttng.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lttng-dev-request@lists.lttng.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev>,
	<mailto:lttng-dev-request@lists.lttng.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org
To: Diego Dompe <ddompe@gmail.com>
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org, tiwg@multicore-association.org
List-Id: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org

* Diego Dompe (ddompe@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm developing a custom tracer for an embedded product that will generate
> CTF format. I was able to generate generic traces that can be interpreted
> properly with babeltrace (but not with eclipse, I already file a bug for
> that), but I found the CTF specification lacking in some aspects (I had to
> peek into lttng-generated CTF traces to figure out some details). I was
> wondering what is the proper mailing list to clear my questions and provide
> feedback on the CTF specification for improvement in the areas where the
> documentation is not detailed yet. I don't see any CTF-specific mailing
> list, it's OK to discuss it here? Or maybe directly with a developer(s)?

Hi Diego,

Yes, this mailing list would be the proper place, along maybe with
adding the MCA tiwg mailing list in CC, which I'm doing here.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com