From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933177Ab2GEQns (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:43:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64183 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925Ab2GEQnr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:43:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 13:43:05 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org, drepper@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf, tool: Enable grouping logic for parsed events Message-ID: <20120705164305.GD7533@infradead.org> References: <1340960907-3725-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1340960907-3725-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <87bojync4b.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20120702101010.GB967@krava.redhat.com> <873959mzi3.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20120704173407.GA2880@krava.redhat.com> <1341504351.7709.6.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1341504351.7709.6.camel@twins> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:05:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 19:34 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > or any other way.. ;) thoughts? > > What again was the downside if always doing additive (instead of > overriding) attributes? Yeah, I think this is the sanest way: additive. Overriding is confusing. - Arnaldo