From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: fweisbec@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net, prasad.krishnan@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v2] Hardware breakpoints: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabled Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:48:50 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120706101653.7515.23309.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120706095233.7082.83395.stgit@localhost.localdomain> From: K.Prasad <Prasad.Krishnan@gmail.com> My apologies. I missed the From header in my previous mail. --- Please find v2 of the patch from Prasad, based on Peter Zijlstra's feedback. This applies on top of v3.5-rc5. This has been tested and found to work fine by Edjunior. Regards, Naveen --- While debugging a warning message on PowerPC while using hardware breakpoints, it was discovered that when perf_event_disable is invoked through hw_breakpoint_handler function with interrupts disabled, a subsequent IPI in the code path would trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE message in smp_call_function_single function. This patch calls __perf_event_disable() when interrupts are already disabled, instead of perf_event_disable(). Reported-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <Prasad.Krishnan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++ kernel/events/core.c | 2 +- kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 10 +++++++++- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index 45db49f..c289ba0 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1292,6 +1292,7 @@ extern int perf_swevent_get_recursion_context(void); extern void perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(int rctx); extern void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event); extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event); +extern int __perf_event_disable(void *info); extern void perf_event_task_tick(void); #else static inline void @@ -1330,6 +1331,7 @@ static inline int perf_swevent_get_recursion_context(void) { return -1; } static inline void perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(int rctx) { } static inline void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event) { } static inline void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event) { } +static inline int __perf_event_disable(void *info) { } static inline void perf_event_task_tick(void) { } #endif diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index d7d71d6..0ad0fc9 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ retry: /* * Cross CPU call to disable a performance event */ -static int __perf_event_disable(void *info) +int __perf_event_disable(void *info) { struct perf_event *event = info; struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx; diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c index bb38c4d..483f14a 100644 --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -453,7 +453,15 @@ int modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *att int old_type = bp->attr.bp_type; int err = 0; - perf_event_disable(bp); + /* + * modify_user_hw_breakpoint can be invoked with IRQs disabled and hence it + * will not be possible to raise IPIs that invoke __perf_event_disable. + * So call the function directly. + */ + if (irqs_disabled()) + __perf_event_disable(bp); + else + perf_event_disable(bp); bp->attr.bp_addr = attr->bp_addr; bp->attr.bp_type = attr->bp_type;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-06 10:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-06-11 6:02 [Patch][perf] Invoke __perf_event_disable without an IPI K.Prasad 2012-06-11 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra 2012-06-12 6:06 ` K.Prasad 2012-06-12 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2012-07-06 9:52 ` [PATCH v2] Hardware breakpoints: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabled Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-06 10:18 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message] 2012-07-18 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND] " Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-18 11:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2012-07-19 11:16 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-25 11:32 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-31 13:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2012-08-02 8:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Naveen N. Rao 2012-08-15 17:37 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-08-15 18:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2012-08-16 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2012-08-29 2:45 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-09-04 18:53 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/hwpb: " tip-bot for K.Prasad
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20120706101653.7515.23309.stgit@localhost.localdomain \ --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \ --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \ --cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=prasad.krishnan@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] Hardware breakpoints: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabled' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.