From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DM MULTIPATH: Allow dm to send
	larger	request if underlying device set to larger max_sectors value
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 02:01:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20120709010132.GA29375@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
References: <F200AD42A082BC4088B232D13A916A8907E5DD64@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Reply-To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F200AD42A082BC4088B232D13A916A8907E5DD64@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: "Chauhan, Vijay" <Vijay.Chauhan@netapp.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>, "Moger,
	Babu" <Babu.Moger@netapp.com>, "Stankey,
	Robert" <Robert.Stankey@netapp.com>
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

Why is this separate from dm_set_device_limits?
Why is this not handled by blk-settings.c?
Should max_sectors be preserved across a table reload?

Alasdair