From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752722Ab2GIJPY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 05:15:24 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:49546 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751121Ab2GIJPX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 05:15:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:15:17 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Paul Turner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Venki Pallipadi , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Vincent Guittot , Nikunj A Dadhania , Mike Galbraith , Kamalesh Babulal , Ben Segall , Ingo Molnar , "Paul E. McKenney" , Morten Rasmussen , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched: aggregate load contributed by task entities on parenting cfs_rq Message-ID: <20120709091517.GC2901@gmail.com> References: <20120628022413.30496.32798.stgit@kitami.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120628022414.30496.73426.stgit@kitami.mtv.corp.google.com> <1341415726.19870.0.camel@laptop> <1341586388.7709.51.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1341586388.7709.51.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 17:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 19:24 -0700, Paul Turner wrote: > > > For a given task t, we can compute its contribution to load as: > > > task_load(t) = runnable_avg(t) * weight(t) > > > > > > On a parenting cfs_rq we can then aggregate > > > runnable_load(cfs_rq) = \Sum task_load(t), for all runnable children t > > > > > > Maintain this bottom up, with task entities adding their contributed load to > > > the parenting cfs_rq sum. When a task entities load changes we add the same > > > delta to the maintained sum. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Turner > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Segall > > > > A lot of patches have this funny sob trail.. Ben never send me these > > patches, so uhm. ? > > > > Should that be Reviewed-by, or what is the deal with those? > > Ben could you clarify what your exact contribution was? > > Ingo, supposing Ben is co-author and wrote a significant part > of the patch, what are we supposed to do with these tags? There can be only one author SOB - additional contributions should be reflected via credits in the changelog, copyright lines and/or Originally-From: tags, or so. Thanks, Ingo