From: Kyle McMartin <kmcmarti@redhat.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: huangj@brocade.com, kgudipat@brocade.com
Subject: [PATCH] bfa: squelch lockdep complaint with a spin_lock_init
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:42:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120711164255.GO2896@redacted.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
Spotted this while looking at another issue...
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
Pid: 298, comm: udevd Not tainted 3.3.0 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff810cee63>] __lock_acquire+0x1363/0x1bb0
[<ffffffff816593d2>] ? __slab_alloc+0x4a0/0x4fd
[<ffffffff81020063>] ? native_sched_clock+0x13/0x80
[<ffffffff810200d9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff810cfd81>] lock_acquire+0xa1/0x1e0
[<ffffffffa0321b83>] ? bfa_fcs_lport_aen_post+0x43/0x160 [bfa]
[<ffffffff816630e5>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x65/0xb0
[<ffffffffa0321b83>] ? bfa_fcs_lport_aen_post+0x43/0x160 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa0321b83>] bfa_fcs_lport_aen_post+0x43/0x160 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa032fa57>] bfa_fcs_lport_init+0x97/0x120 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa031d4ff>] bfa_fcs_fabric_sm_uninit+0x1cf/0x250 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa031c1da>] bfa_fcs_fabric_modinit+0x2a/0xb0 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa031bef2>] ? bfa_fcs_fabric_attach+0xf2/0x170 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa031e75a>] bfa_fcs_init+0x2a/0x40 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa02facf7>] bfad_drv_init+0x107/0x1f0 [bfa]
[<ffffffffa02fb057>] bfad_pci_probe+0x277/0x450 [bfa]
[<ffffffff81354d4c>] local_pci_probe+0x5c/0xd0
[<ffffffff81354ed1>] pci_device_probe+0x111/0x120
[<ffffffff8141c0e6>] driver_probe_device+0x96/0x2f0
[<ffffffff8141c3eb>] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0
[<ffffffff8141c340>] ? driver_probe_device+0x2f0/0x2f0
[<ffffffff8141a2e5>] bus_for_each_dev+0x55/0x90
[<ffffffffa037b000>] ? 0xffffffffa037afff
[<ffffffff8141bbce>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff8141b8d8>] bus_add_driver+0x1b8/0x2b0
[<ffffffffa037b000>] ? 0xffffffffa037afff
[<ffffffff8141cbc7>] driver_register+0x77/0x160
[<ffffffffa037b000>] ? 0xffffffffa037afff
[<ffffffff81353b23>] __pci_register_driver+0x73/0xf0
[<ffffffffa037b000>] ? 0xffffffffa037afff
[<ffffffffa037b083>] bfad_init+0x83/0x1000 [bfa]
[<ffffffff8100212a>] do_one_initcall+0x12a/0x180
[<ffffffff810df0d0>] sys_init_module+0xc0/0x220
[<ffffffff8166bbe9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kmcmarti@redhat.com>
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c
@@ -1383,6 +1383,8 @@ bfad_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pid)
bfa_sm_set_state(bfad, bfad_sm_uninit);
spin_lock_init(&bfad->bfad_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&bfad->bfad_aen_spinlock);
+
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, bfad);
bfad->ref_count = 0;
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 16:42 Kyle McMartin [this message]
2012-07-11 18:53 ` [PATCH] bfa: squelch lockdep complaint with a spin_lock_init Krishna Gudipati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120711164255.GO2896@redacted.bos.redhat.com \
--to=kmcmarti@redhat.com \
--cc=huangj@brocade.com \
--cc=kgudipat@brocade.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.