From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753262Ab2GMV4H (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:56:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27700 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751455Ab2GMV4E (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:56:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:55:46 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Paul Bolle Cc: Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ubuntu Kernel Team , Debian Kernel Team , OpenSUSE Kernel Team , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Fedora Kernel Team Subject: Re: [RFC] Simplifying kernel configuration for distro issues Message-ID: <20120713215546.GH1707@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Paul Bolle , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ubuntu Kernel Team , Debian Kernel Team , OpenSUSE Kernel Team , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Fedora Kernel Team References: <20120713210240.GG1707@redhat.com> <1342216225.15453.15.camel@x61.thuisdomein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1342216225.15453.15.camel@x61.thuisdomein> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:50:25PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > But just removing all the certainly unused macros probably wouldn't have > made a noticeable difference to anyone using those defconfig files > anyway. My point is that I don't think there's many people actually using them. (maybe more on the niche platforms, but x86[64] ? I'm sceptical they're used at all) Dave