From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755356Ab2GQPsB (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:48:01 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:53736 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752168Ab2GQPr7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:47:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:47:53 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Jiri Olsa , Ulrich Drepper , Namhyung Kim , acme@redhat.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/3] perf tool: Add new event group management Message-ID: <20120717154753.GK11413@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1340960907-3725-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <87fw9blyhj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20120702101518.GC967@krava.redhat.com> <1341234662.1476.13.camel@leonhard> <20120702133341.GD967@krava.redhat.com> <20120709110528.GA965@krava.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > To me ,this looks a bit of an over-engineered design and it is not based on > any actual user requests. Don't get me wrong, grouping is useful and required > but nobody has ever asked for that level of flexibility. The syntax you have > now is already very rich for my taste. The user input I hear is just get the basic support working ASAP. -Andi