From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: paulus@samba.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com, acme@ghostprotocols.net, prasad.krishnan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Hardware breakpoints: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabled Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:57:03 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120718115700.GB6233@somewhere.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120718103046.7512.8326.stgit@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:00:46PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > Please find v2 of the patch from Prasad, based on Peter Zijlstra's > feedback. This applies on top of v3.5-rc7. This has been tested and > found to work fine by Edjunior. > > Regards, > Naveen > ______ > > From: K.Prasad <Prasad.Krishnan@gmail.com> > > While debugging a warning message on PowerPC while using hardware > breakpoints, it was discovered that when perf_event_disable is invoked > through hw_breakpoint_handler function with interrupts disabled, a > subsequent IPI in the code path would trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE message in > smp_call_function_single function. > > This patch calls __perf_event_disable() when interrupts are already > disabled, instead of perf_event_disable(). > > Reported-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <Prasad.Krishnan@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++ > kernel/events/core.c | 2 +- > kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 10 +++++++++- > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h > index 45db49f..c289ba0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h > @@ -1292,6 +1292,7 @@ extern int perf_swevent_get_recursion_context(void); > extern void perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(int rctx); > extern void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event); > extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event); > +extern int __perf_event_disable(void *info); > extern void perf_event_task_tick(void); > #else > static inline void > @@ -1330,6 +1331,7 @@ static inline int perf_swevent_get_recursion_context(void) { return -1; } > static inline void perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(int rctx) { } > static inline void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event) { } > static inline void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event) { } > +static inline int __perf_event_disable(void *info) { } > static inline void perf_event_task_tick(void) { } > #endif > > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c > index d7d71d6..0ad0fc9 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/core.c > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c > @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ retry: > /* > * Cross CPU call to disable a performance event > */ > -static int __perf_event_disable(void *info) > +int __perf_event_disable(void *info) > { > struct perf_event *event = info; > struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx; > diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > index bb38c4d..483f14a 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > @@ -453,7 +453,15 @@ int modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *att > int old_type = bp->attr.bp_type; > int err = 0; > > - perf_event_disable(bp); > + /* > + * modify_user_hw_breakpoint can be invoked with IRQs disabled and hence it > + * will not be possible to raise IPIs that invoke __perf_event_disable. > + * So call the function directly. > + */ > + if (irqs_disabled()) > + __perf_event_disable(bp); > + else > + perf_event_disable(bp); This only works if we are sure the bp is on the current CPU. Do we have that guarantee? > > bp->attr.bp_addr = attr->bp_addr; > bp->attr.bp_type = attr->bp_type; >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 11:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-06-11 6:02 [Patch][perf] Invoke __perf_event_disable without an IPI K.Prasad 2012-06-11 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra 2012-06-12 6:06 ` K.Prasad 2012-06-12 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2012-07-06 9:52 ` [PATCH v2] Hardware breakpoints: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabled Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-06 10:18 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-18 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND] " Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-18 11:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message] 2012-07-19 11:16 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-25 11:32 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-07-31 13:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2012-08-02 8:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Naveen N. Rao 2012-08-15 17:37 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-08-15 18:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2012-08-16 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2012-08-29 2:45 ` Naveen N. Rao 2012-09-04 18:53 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/hwpb: " tip-bot for K.Prasad
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20120718115700.GB6233@somewhere.redhat.com \ --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \ --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \ --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \ --cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=prasad.krishnan@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Hardware breakpoints: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabled' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.