From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 09/12] net/eipoib: Add main driver functionality Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:36:42 +0300 Message-ID: <20120812103642.GH1421@redhat.com> References: <501C3527.6060809@mellanox.com> <20120803.143315.151094375569109262.davem@davemloft.net> <501C5328.4060301@mellanox.com> <20120803.163627.1867181085116225405.davem@davemloft.net> <50205DE0.7080706@mellanox.com> <87obmnfs4p.fsf@xmission.com> <87pq714uaa.fsf@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Ali Ayoub , David Miller , ogerlitz@mellanox.com, roland@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sean.hefty@intel.com, erezsh@mellanox.co.il, dledford@redhat.com To: Or Gerlitz Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13629 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750828Ab2HLKiA (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:38:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 07:34:23AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > Infiniband is standard enough you could quite easily implement virtual > > infiniband bridging as an alternative to ethernet bridging. > > Not really, as Michael indicated in his response over this thread > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=134419288218373&w=2 > IPoIB link layer addresses use IB HW constructs for which soft > hardware address setting isn't supported, and this interferes > with live migration. > > Or. But I'd just like to point out your code does not support softmac either. -- MST