On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:43:22PM +0300, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY <kishon@ti.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@ti.com>
> > wrote:
> > > TWL6030/32 that is used on 4430sdp board can deliver up to 200mA
> > > for OTG port power supply in the HOST mode.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> > > index 8e17284..10223f5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> > > @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static struct platform_device *sdp4430_devices[]
> > > __initdata = {
> > >  static struct omap_musb_board_data musb_board_data = {
> > >         .interface_type         = MUSB_INTERFACE_UTMI,
> > >         .mode                   = MUSB_OTG,
> > > -       .power                  = 100,
> > > +       .power                  = 200,
> > >  };
> >
> > Shouldn't this change be made for omap4 panda as well.
> 
> Yes, omap4 panda uses same TWL IC. Should I fix this patch or send
> separate for panda?

Fix this patch would be nicer.

-- 
balbi