From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: flush dcache before returning zeroed huge page to userspace
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:32:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120816183255.GB19401@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120816182015.GC12578@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 16-08-12 17:09:54, Will Deacon wrote:
> > +static inline void arch_clear_hugepage_flags(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + flush_dcache_page(page);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why do we need the hook for ia64? hugetlb_no_page calls clear_huge_page
> and that one calls flush_dcache_page (via clear_user_page), right?
> The same applies to copy_huge_page for COW.
You're right, these are redundant for ppc and ia64 (although ppc does have a
comment moaning about the flush). Looks like it's just sh and ARM that need to
do anything.
Cheers,
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: flush dcache before returning zeroed huge page to userspace
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:32:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120816183255.GB19401@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120816182015.GC12578@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 16-08-12 17:09:54, Will Deacon wrote:
> > +static inline void arch_clear_hugepage_flags(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + flush_dcache_page(page);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why do we need the hook for ia64? hugetlb_no_page calls clear_huge_page
> and that one calls flush_dcache_page (via clear_user_page), right?
> The same applies to copy_huge_page for COW.
You're right, these are redundant for ppc and ia64 (although ppc does have a
comment moaning about the flush). Looks like it's just sh and ARM that need to
do anything.
Cheers,
Will
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-16 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 14:32 [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: flush dcache before returning zeroed huge page to userspace Will Deacon
2012-07-04 14:32 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-05 12:37 ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-05 12:37 ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-05 14:17 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-05 14:17 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-06 13:15 ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-06 13:15 ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-09 12:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-09 12:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-09 14:13 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-09 14:13 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-09 23:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-09 23:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-10 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-10 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-10 10:42 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-10 10:42 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-11 17:48 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-11 17:48 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-12 11:16 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12 11:16 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12 11:26 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-12 11:26 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-12 11:26 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-12 11:26 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-12 11:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12 11:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-07 16:03 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-07 16:03 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-08 16:26 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-08 16:26 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 16:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 16:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 16:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 16:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 17:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 17:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 17:34 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 17:34 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 18:06 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 18:06 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 18:19 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 18:19 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 18:20 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 18:20 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 18:32 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-08-16 18:32 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120816183255.GB19401@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.