From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55081 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751982Ab2H1Mmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:42:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:42:15 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Daniel Golle Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, gwingerde@gmail.com, heinold@inf.fu-berlin.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rt2x00: add MediaTek/RaLink Rt3352 WiSoC Message-ID: <20120828124214.GA8426@redhat.com> (sfid-20120828_144303_208214_11D0AFBC) References: <20120821235349.GA14648@earthship.home> <20120822105110.GC6082@redhat.com> <20120824152542.GA32145@earthship.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20120824152542.GA32145@earthship.home> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:25:42PM +0300, Daniel Golle wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:51:10PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > Please address my comments from previous patch. > > I fixed the CodingStyle issues you mentioned and simplified the initilization of > the TX_SW_CFG{0,1,2} registers similarly to other SoCs. Thanks. Could you also provide information what was the source (registers programming) you based when writing this patch? > + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3352)) { > + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 27, 0x0); > + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 62, 0x26 + rt2x00dev->lna_gain); > + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 27, 0x20); > + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 62, 0x26 + rt2x00dev->lna_gain); Writes two times to the same registers are intended? Stanislaw