From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Linux Wireless List" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>,
"Milan Bouchet-Valat" <nalimilan@club-internet.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcmsmac: rework of mac80211 .flush() callback operation
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:49:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905114910.GA2466@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50472B74.5060104@broadcom.com>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:37:40PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 12:20 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:49:22AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >>+ ret = wait_event_timeout(wl->tx_flush_wq,
> >>+ brcms_tx_flush_completed(wl),
> >>+ msecs_to_jiffies(BRCMS_FLUSH_TIMEOUT));
> >>+
> >>+ ieee80211_wake_queues(hw);
> >>+ WARN_ON(!ret);
> >Any particular reason why this WARN_ON is after ieee80211_wake_queues() ?
> >
>
> The wait has a timeout so the warning indicates flush did not
> complete as in the old implementation. Maybe a WARN_ON_ONCE() would
> be better, but I have not observed the warning yet.
Yeah, but I rather asked why it is _after_ ieee80211_wake_queues(),
not before, just after wait_event_timeout().
Not big deal thought, just if something wrong will happen in
ieee80211_wake_queues() order of error prints will be confusing.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 9:49 [PATCH 0/2] brcmsmac: fix for regulatory rules and flush callback Arend van Spriel
2012-09-05 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] brcmsmac: fix mismatch in number of custom regulatory rules Arend van Spriel
2012-09-05 12:40 ` Seth Forshee
2012-09-05 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] brcmsmac: rework of mac80211 .flush() callback operation Arend van Spriel
2012-09-05 10:20 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-09-05 10:37 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-09-05 11:49 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2012-09-05 16:57 ` Seth Forshee
2012-09-05 17:33 ` Brad Figg
2012-09-05 19:21 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-09-05 19:33 ` Seth Forshee
2012-09-05 20:00 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-09-05 20:07 ` Seth Forshee
2012-09-05 19:46 ` Brad Figg
2012-09-05 19:48 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] brcmsmac: fix for regulatory rules and flush callback Arend van Spriel
2012-09-10 18:33 ` John W. Linville
2012-09-10 20:41 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905114910.GA2466@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=nalimilan@club-internet.fr \
--cc=noelamac@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.