From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755684Ab2IQK4L (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:56:11 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:32976 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755654Ab2IQK4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:56:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:00:47 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Matt Fleming Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming , "H. Peter Anvin" , Matthew Garrett , Olof Johansson , Peter Jones , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch to vga console only if framebuffer details are missing Message-ID: <20120917120047.42b520ac@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1347877748-11766-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> References: <1347877748-11766-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:29:08 +0100 Matt Fleming wrote: > From: Matt Fleming > > The efi_enabled variable has come to mean "Do we have EFI runtime > services available?". However, lack of EFI runtime services does not > mean that we should switch to using the VGA console. Provided that the > boot loader passed the dimensions of the EFI framebuffer there is no > reason we can't use efifb. Speed is the obvious one. vga con is fast, efifb is not