From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752773Ab2JAMg5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:36:57 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33213 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929Ab2JAMgz (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:36:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:36:54 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, devel@openvz.org, Tejun Heo , linux-mm@kvack.org, Suleiman Souhlal , Frederic Weisbecker , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management Message-ID: <20121001123654.GJ8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1347977050-29476-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1347977050-29476-10-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20121001121553.GG8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50698C97.70703@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50698C97.70703@parallels.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked, > > right? > > > > Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we > will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still > using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted. Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next version? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx192.postini.com [74.125.245.192]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A33786B005D for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:36:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:36:54 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management Message-ID: <20121001123654.GJ8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1347977050-29476-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1347977050-29476-10-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20121001121553.GG8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50698C97.70703@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50698C97.70703@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, devel@openvz.org, Tejun Heo , linux-mm@kvack.org, Suleiman Souhlal , Frederic Weisbecker , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Johannes Weiner On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked, > > right? > > > > Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we > will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still > using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted. Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next version? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:36:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20121001123654.GJ8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1347977050-29476-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1347977050-29476-10-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20121001121553.GG8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50698C97.70703@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50698C97.70703-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Suleiman Souhlal , Frederic Weisbecker , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Johannes Weiner On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked, > > right? > > > > Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we > will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still > using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted. Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next version? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs