From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752877Ab2JULSg (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:18:36 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:37415 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752464Ab2JULSf (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:18:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:18:32 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dave Airlie Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Pekka Enberg , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.7-rc0 Message-ID: <20121021111832.GB6504@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Dave Airlie , Stephen Rothwell , Pekka Enberg , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig References: <20121016134129.2fcd7c8ebe1235065aea929e@canb.auug.org.au> <20121020180436.c42b7325431fe87104b008fa@canb.auug.org.au> <20121020181425.GA11191@liondog.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:07:31PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > Why couldn't this script just be a wrapper around qemu? > > I get the kvm developers developing features that isn't ideal, but for > the quick boot a kernel tests, I don't see why a well maintained qemu > wrapper isn't superior. I hate constructing qemu command lines, but a > script in the kernel repo seems like a good idea. Well, Alex Graf had exactly that but I don't know what happened to it - I can't find it upstream at least. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-08/msg02728.html -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.