From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934969Ab2JaH2F (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 03:28:05 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:53741 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934408Ab2JaH16 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 03:27:58 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Richard Cochran , Jason Cooper , Imre Kaloz Subject: Re: [PULL REQ] IXP4xx changes for Linux 3.7 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:27:55 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Krzysztof Halasa , Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lkml , arm@kernel.org References: <20121029082940.GC2527@netboy.at.omicron.at> In-Reply-To: <20121029082940.GC2527@netboy.at.omicron.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210302227.55857.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:jyC0YvX4CQPpR+NccKfgJpvaTZa8hrcRXjirHjMLQMJ ZU9Q6ZGoeTpClZgfeADOb6ZjO4uvD7WwugyjJjeH5GJTNTrt3r uzM5vsR0+w7TqbbFRD3qdYDQ97ryCiAsVlt3Yd3oEHB8DDBOJA vNDTvV/QjCa7NOvpDNZebPNs0Qkyw3zKMvjWPPImyoWW9OFJdj CxgpeWViSEa8gpBU5HbJl/hP4L6o7xBDN9msrhKtTmgtqwPGqV Nbt+2V0HS+pOrdZ6euJBV++45oGfL0UOysnWuijMrESzOX1Enx MRGntTSpmLM0IhYpR+l4KPm/gchQgRD/Tntl5vGO0L1GsO1F8H KemY2JylhBf/R9QhM10A= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 29 October 2012, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01:17AM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > > > Don't get me wrong. If I had time for this it could be different. > > Unfortunately IXP4xx is a legacy arch, and for me it's simply a hobby at > > this point. Given the raised barriers to participate, probably aimed at > > paid maintainers, I have to quit doing this. > > > > BTW since Imre has probably even much less time, it would be a good time > > to find someone to maintain IXP4xx code. I will be publishing (from time > > to time) my tree (I'm using the hw myself), so even simple > > cherry-picking would probably make some sense. > > So if no one else wants to do this, then I am willing to look after > the IXP code. I think that I do have the time for it. Thanks for the offer! Jason Cooper was also volunteering to help out with this, and even we can't convince Krzysztof to continue doing it, there is also Imre who is officially listed as maintainer for IXP4xx and who has not commented on this. As Krzysztof mentions, he probably doesn't have much time for it, but I'd like to give him the chance to comment as well. I'm sure we can find some solution between the four of you. Right now, I think we should focus on getting the bug fixes from Krzysztof's tree into mainline and the stable kernels where applicable, and then establish a better working mode for the future kernels. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:27:55 +0000 Subject: [PULL REQ] IXP4xx changes for Linux 3.7 In-Reply-To: <20121029082940.GC2527@netboy.at.omicron.at> References: <20121029082940.GC2527@netboy.at.omicron.at> Message-ID: <201210302227.55857.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 29 October 2012, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01:17AM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > > > Don't get me wrong. If I had time for this it could be different. > > Unfortunately IXP4xx is a legacy arch, and for me it's simply a hobby at > > this point. Given the raised barriers to participate, probably aimed at > > paid maintainers, I have to quit doing this. > > > > BTW since Imre has probably even much less time, it would be a good time > > to find someone to maintain IXP4xx code. I will be publishing (from time > > to time) my tree (I'm using the hw myself), so even simple > > cherry-picking would probably make some sense. > > So if no one else wants to do this, then I am willing to look after > the IXP code. I think that I do have the time for it. Thanks for the offer! Jason Cooper was also volunteering to help out with this, and even we can't convince Krzysztof to continue doing it, there is also Imre who is officially listed as maintainer for IXP4xx and who has not commented on this. As Krzysztof mentions, he probably doesn't have much time for it, but I'd like to give him the chance to comment as well. I'm sure we can find some solution between the four of you. Right now, I think we should focus on getting the bug fixes from Krzysztof's tree into mainline and the stable kernels where applicable, and then establish a better working mode for the future kernels. Arnd