From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: Add simple poweroff-gpio driver Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:19:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20121112181947.GS24583@lunn.ch> References: <1352650891-18356-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1352650891-18356-2-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <50A020C5.4070506@wwwdotorg.org> <20121112082546.GU22029@lunn.ch> <50A1212C.2080601@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A1212C.2080601-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Stephen Warren , anton.vorontsov-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Linus Walleij Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, jm-Pj/HzkgeCk7QXOPxS62xeg@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, gmbnomis-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:17:48AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/12/2012 01:25 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 03:03:49PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 11/11/2012 09:21 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >>> From: Jamie Lentin > >>> > >>> Given appropriate devicetree bindings, this driver registers a > >>> pm_power_off function to set a GPIO line high/low to power down > >>> your board. > > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-poweroff.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-poweroff.txt > >> > >>> +Required properties: > >>> +- compatible : should be "gpio-poweroff". > >>> +- gpios : The GPIO to set high/low, see "gpios property" in > >>> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt. If the pin should be > >>> + low to power down the board set it to "Active Low", otherwise set > >>> + gpio to "Active High". > >> > >> Unfortunately, not all GPIO bindings support active high/low flags in > >> the GPIO specifier. As such, the flags there are basically useless. > >> Other bindings (e.g. IIRC the fixed-regulator binding) have added a > >> separate active-high property to indicate the GPIO polarity. This > >> binding should probably follow suite. > > > > Humm, so are you saying of_get_named_gpio_flags() is deprecated? > > I don't know if it's deprecated, but it's certainly not useful in > generic code. Hi Linus, Anton How do you see this? I'm happy to implement an enable-active-high property, but it seems to go against the purpose of of_get_named_gpio_flags(). Is that function deprecated? Thanks Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:19:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: Add simple poweroff-gpio driver In-Reply-To: <50A1212C.2080601@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1352650891-18356-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1352650891-18356-2-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <50A020C5.4070506@wwwdotorg.org> <20121112082546.GU22029@lunn.ch> <50A1212C.2080601@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20121112181947.GS24583@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:17:48AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/12/2012 01:25 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 03:03:49PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 11/11/2012 09:21 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >>> From: Jamie Lentin > >>> > >>> Given appropriate devicetree bindings, this driver registers a > >>> pm_power_off function to set a GPIO line high/low to power down > >>> your board. > > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-poweroff.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-poweroff.txt > >> > >>> +Required properties: > >>> +- compatible : should be "gpio-poweroff". > >>> +- gpios : The GPIO to set high/low, see "gpios property" in > >>> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt. If the pin should be > >>> + low to power down the board set it to "Active Low", otherwise set > >>> + gpio to "Active High". > >> > >> Unfortunately, not all GPIO bindings support active high/low flags in > >> the GPIO specifier. As such, the flags there are basically useless. > >> Other bindings (e.g. IIRC the fixed-regulator binding) have added a > >> separate active-high property to indicate the GPIO polarity. This > >> binding should probably follow suite. > > > > Humm, so are you saying of_get_named_gpio_flags() is deprecated? > > I don't know if it's deprecated, but it's certainly not useful in > generic code. Hi Linus, Anton How do you see this? I'm happy to implement an enable-active-high property, but it seems to go against the purpose of of_get_named_gpio_flags(). Is that function deprecated? Thanks Andrew