From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755727Ab2KMT4m (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:56:42 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:48430 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755478Ab2KMT4l (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:56:41 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,768,1352102400"; d="scan'208";a="219138390" Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:56:37 +0100 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, swarren@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 RESEND 0/4] mfd: tps65910: use regmap irq framework for interrupt Message-ID: <20121113195637.GQ27828@sortiz-mobl> References: <1352815439-26040-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1352815439-26040-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Laxman, On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 07:33:55PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > This patch series has following change: > - Use regmap irq framework for interrupt registration. Corrected the > register bit definition for interrupts. > - Move the irq table to tps65910.c and get rid of tps65910-irq.c. > - Raarrange the init sequence of different sub moduled of tps65910 like > irq, clock and then mfd devices. > - Export the irq domain handle from regmap to use in mfd driver. > - Pass the irq domain in mfd_add_devices to have proper interrupt mapping > for sub devices like RTC. > > > Changes from V1: > - rearrange patch on which older patch3 become the new patch 1. > - Add stub for new api in the regmap. > - Add empty line if paragraph change in description. > > Changes from V2: > - Remove the older 4th patch where API for getting irq_domain was added > in regmap. It is already taken care by Mark B. The patchset looks fine, but it should either go through Mark's tree or I should merge Mark's regmap_irq_get_domain patch to my for-next branch. Mark, any preference ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/