From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756666Ab2KNGCq (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:02:46 -0500 Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:60975 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756654Ab2KNGCo (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:02:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:02:32 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Pekka Enberg , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.7-rc0 Message-ID: <20121114060232.GB20380@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Stephen Rothwell , Pekka Enberg , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig References: <20121016134129.2fcd7c8ebe1235065aea929e@canb.auug.org.au> <20121020180436.c42b7325431fe87104b008fa@canb.auug.org.au> <20121114162448.e2b05b1be8c62bcb64cc7d42@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121114162448.e2b05b1be8c62bcb64cc7d42@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:24:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > So, where did we get to? I *think* the consensus was that the KVM tool > did not need to be in the kernel tree, right? In which case: > > 1) I need to remove the kvmtool tree from linux-next > 2) the same code needs to be removed from the tip tree I believe Linus has made his preferences clear on this... - Ted