From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751153Ab2KNFY7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:24:59 -0500 Received: from haggis.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.10]:48271 "EHLO members.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869Ab2KNFY6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:24:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:24:48 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.7-rc0 Message-Id: <20121114162448.e2b05b1be8c62bcb64cc7d42@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20121020180436.c42b7325431fe87104b008fa@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20121016134129.2fcd7c8ebe1235065aea929e@canb.auug.org.au> <20121020180436.c42b7325431fe87104b008fa@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA256"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__14_Nov_2012_16_24_48_+1100_o8kaMzl7r5pOY=LX" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Wed__14_Nov_2012_16_24_48_+1100_o8kaMzl7r5pOY=LX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all again, On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:04:36 +1100 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 07:50:52 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >> > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git kv= mtool/for-linus > > > > > > So you have not taken this in the v3.7 merge window. > > > > > > Will you ever merge this? > >=20 > > I have yet to see a compelling argument for merging it. It's tons of > > code, it doesnt match the original "small simple" model, and I think > > it would be better off as a separate project. >=20 > So are there any compelling arguments from the proponents, or can I > remove this from linux-next (and have it removed from the tip auto-latest > branch)? So, where did we get to? I *think* the consensus was that the KVM tool did not need to be in the kernel tree, right? In which case: 1) I need to remove the kvmtool tree from linux-next 2) the same code needs to be removed from the tip tree hmm? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Signature=_Wed__14_Nov_2012_16_24_48_+1100_o8kaMzl7r5pOY=LX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQoysgAAoJEECxmPOUX5FE00gP/0qL6qsJxho479VubeMIX/Zz /BI28bvlz1E6JoDiYdbAX4JZzrewfUIcIxugXmgNYZXOu8HEq3q2ePuMUt+i0TpT q86N8HRoroxxvWgQgNSbe9Ux5yJb+YcokKJTLonN9A3XvesTnH+9JTfd1LYPARj/ BURhH76IWUXbX+emJEX3/y/FbWrWHi1hosoTEXrsYVWZ47sEizCMfVjIhhdp0hdh ghpUGzUl/mDHXWj+jWXKO/AmcSc9maqWfzKpNskyj/tnYyksnWZ2rOqyJpz9UuOK sAij9qjOdnRVB3iALAjw2YOJirrS/f57K4xC4iWqcJvUCxiIx+n+V+gPNxJO4ycd B3GjikjHIWOzCgFjfr94g1iVMcmQd83KVD/Ss+gOIzm7TfmIEn1sUbQnkcYS0wan Taj2UcUrnqNDVghUkAbSCsmgoK9ZcYRt+N/W/WwWJG5B/oLiRUXBAeJVeGQFeplC ztzjOZJDYvTsf7z79qijjwHZTvh6N4WkGRmdOTtkbqe3i0ne8czCBKb7K0TabKWL RGTxuckEyFpcJIW/BnpPsRvmQzKPzwUwicQR9QjRLpCFvuS0LqaRogDHYqHvTEtD Z7tEOeGyBRtNdHrkeKbCDViXSfcP+u/Ku8lKdiyyAyHeYZpIsPfR4Bywm0UcEkAu v79214ZxswDDR9X9rklo =5ywe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__14_Nov_2012_16_24_48_+1100_o8kaMzl7r5pOY=LX--