* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-15 8:33 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2012-11-15 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel; +Cc: arnd, linus.walleij, Lee Jones
UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
index 4a0c40a..d2076ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
@@ -262,11 +262,10 @@ static struct device * __init u8500_of_init_devices(void)
static struct of_dev_auxdata u8500_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
/* Requires call-back bindings. */
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,cortex-a9-pmu", 0, "arm-pmu", &db8500_pmu_platdata),
- /* Requires DMA and call-back bindings. */
+ /* Requires DMA bindings. */
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80120000, "uart0", &uart0_plat),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80121000, "uart1", &uart1_plat),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80007000, "uart2", &uart2_plat),
- /* Requires DMA bindings. */
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl022", 0x80002000, "ssp0", &ssp0_plat),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80126000, "sdi0", &mop500_sdi0_data),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80118000, "sdi1", &mop500_sdi1_data),
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-15 8:33 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2012-11-15 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
index 4a0c40a..d2076ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
@@ -262,11 +262,10 @@ static struct device * __init u8500_of_init_devices(void)
static struct of_dev_auxdata u8500_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
/* Requires call-back bindings. */
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,cortex-a9-pmu", 0, "arm-pmu", &db8500_pmu_platdata),
- /* Requires DMA and call-back bindings. */
+ /* Requires DMA bindings. */
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80120000, "uart0", &uart0_plat),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80121000, "uart1", &uart1_plat),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80007000, "uart2", &uart2_plat),
- /* Requires DMA bindings. */
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl022", 0x80002000, "ssp0", &ssp0_plat),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80126000, "sdi0", &mop500_sdi0_data),
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80118000, "sdi1", &mop500_sdi1_data),
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
2012-11-15 8:33 ` Lee Jones
@ 2012-11-15 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-11-15 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linus.walleij, Vinod Koul, Jon Hunter
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
3.8.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-15 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-11-15 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
3.8.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
2012-11-15 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2012-11-15 12:33 ` Lee Jones
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2012-11-15 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linus.walleij, Vinod Koul, Jon Hunter
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
> 3.8.
It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-15 12:33 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2012-11-15 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
> 3.8.
It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
2012-11-15 8:33 ` Lee Jones
@ 2012-11-15 17:28 ` Linus Walleij
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-11-15 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, arnd, linus.walleij
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-15 17:28 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-11-15 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
2012-11-15 12:33 ` Lee Jones
@ 2012-11-16 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-11-16 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linus.walleij, Vinod Koul, Jon Hunter
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> > > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> > > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
> > it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
> > 3.8.
>
> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
>
> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
>
Vinod,
is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
on that work, so we are running out of time now.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-16 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-11-16 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> > > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> > > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
> > it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
> > 3.8.
>
> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
>
> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
>
Vinod,
is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
on that work, so we are running out of time now.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
2012-11-16 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2012-11-16 15:27 ` Jon Hunter
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2012-11-16 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Lee Jones, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linus.walleij, Vinod Koul
On 11/16/2012 03:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
>>>> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
>>>> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
>>> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
>>> 3.8.
>>
>> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
>>
>> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
>>
>
> Vinod,
>
> is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
>
> I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> on that work, so we are running out of time now.
Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
Jon
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/89502
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-16 15:27 ` Jon Hunter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2012-11-16 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 11/16/2012 03:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
>>>> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
>>>> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
>>> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
>>> 3.8.
>>
>> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
>>
>> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
>>
>
> Vinod,
>
> is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
>
> I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> on that work, so we are running out of time now.
Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
Jon
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/89502
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
2012-11-16 15:27 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2012-11-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-11-16 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: Lee Jones, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linus.walleij, Vinod Koul
On Friday 16 November 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> > his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
> >
> > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> > on that work, so we are running out of time now.
>
> Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
>
Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-11-16 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Friday 16 November 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> > his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
> >
> > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> > on that work, so we are running out of time now.
>
> Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
>
Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
2012-11-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2012-11-16 15:39 ` Koul, Vinod
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Koul, Vinod @ 2012-11-16 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann, Jon Hunter
Cc: Lee Jones, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linus.walleij
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 757 bytes --]
> > > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend his
> > > latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
> > >
> > > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based on
> > > that work, so we are running out of time now.
> >
> > Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
> >
>
> Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!
If you have any patches for this, please send me. Your work should not stall,
that is why I had the topic branch.
I plan to merge this to my next mid next week,....
....based on how early my travel permits :)
--
~Vinod
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
@ 2012-11-16 15:39 ` Koul, Vinod
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Koul, Vinod @ 2012-11-16 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
> > > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend his
> > > latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
> > >
> > > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based on
> > > that work, so we are running out of time now.
> >
> > Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
> >
>
> Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!
If you have any patches for this, please send me. Your work should not stall,
that is why I had the topic branch.
I plan to merge this to my next mid next week,....
....based on how early my travel permits :)
--
~Vinod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-16 15:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-15 8:33 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately Lee Jones
2012-11-15 8:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 12:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 12:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-16 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 15:27 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-16 15:27 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 15:39 ` Koul, Vinod
2012-11-16 15:39 ` Koul, Vinod
2012-11-15 17:28 ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-15 17:28 ` Linus Walleij
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.