From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752804Ab2KSBKU (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:10:20 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:51623 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752722Ab2KSBKS (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:10:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:10:13 +0000 From: Al Viro To: David Miller Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, monstr@monstr.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sigaltstack fun Message-ID: <20121119011013.GJ16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20121118.140332.1273544560009594278.davem@davemloft.net> <20121118195921.GH16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20121118210253.GI16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20121118.161833.985081954687473276.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121118.161833.985081954687473276.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:18:33PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Al Viro > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:02:53 +0000 > > > Are you OK with the patch below? Should be the minimal fix, getting > > rid of those segfaults and converting to usual semantics here... > > > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro > > Yep, looks fine: > > Acked-by: David S. Miller Er... So which tree should that go through? sparc or signal? There's a similar microblaze patch and a few more of the "do_sigaltstack() takes userland pointer" variety, so I can put together a pile in signal.git#for-linus, but if you prefer that to go through sparc tree, I'm fine with that...