From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:55:55 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/9] dfu: Send correct DFU response from
	composite_setup
In-Reply-To: <50C738BA.3050105@ti.com>
References: <1354298472-3605-1-git-send-email-panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
	<201212110147.49045.marex@denx.de> <50C738BA.3050105@ti.com>
Message-ID: <201212121855.55897.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Tom Rini,

> On 12/10/12 19:47, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Lukasz Majewski,
> > 
> >> Pantelis,
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > Hm hm ... I suspect it'd be nice to have a separate DFU custodian.
> > That'd leverage some burden from me. I like that idea. I wonder if
> > it'd be nice to start building such bigger net of custodians.
> 
> So long as everyone involved plays nice, we have a maintainer of the
> code (Lukasz) and another user / developer of the code (Pantelis).  I
> don't think we need to go full on custodian right now.  Lukasz is
> reviewing and trying to understand what Pantelis is seeing since we're
> seeing some odd issues on the second platform to add DFU support.

WFM, but it'd leverage burden from me. And I honestly dont understand the DFU as 
much as Lukasz does.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut