From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] x86, apicv: add virtual x2apic support
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:45:25 +0200
Message-ID: <20130122094525.GC8427@redhat.com>
References: <1358331672-32384-1-git-send-email-yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
 <1358331672-32384-3-git-send-email-yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
 <20130121195907.GA3561@amt.cnet>
 <20130121202114.GE25818@redhat.com>
 <20130121212113.GC7110@amt.cnet>
 <20130121213420.GA8427@redhat.com>
 <20130121221618.GE10985@amt.cnet>
 <20130122003346.GA26201@amt.cnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	haitao.shan@intel.com, xiantao.zhang@intel.com,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13453 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752154Ab3AVJpd (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:45:33 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130122003346.GA26201@amt.cnet>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:33:46PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > The question is, why is intercept for EOI MSR address (0x80B) not being
> > disabled here, while TPR is? I don't see intercept disabled by other
> > patches either.
> 
> Point still valid: why intercept for EOI MSR address not being disabled?
Yang sent two version of the third patch. Second one disabled intercept
for EOI MSR. Ignore the first one.

--
			Gleb.