From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: mmci: Move ios_handler functionality into the driver Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:13:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20130123101349.GH15873@gmail.com> References: <1355495429-12510-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <1355495429-12510-3-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20130122090000.GH6857@gmail.com> <20130122100607.GH23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130122102010.GL6857@gmail.com> <20130122103723.GI23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130122105608.GP6857@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:65054 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754915Ab3AWKNy (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:13:54 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fo12so3086092lab.28 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:13:52 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130122105608.GP6857@gmail.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Linus Walleij , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ulf Hansson On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > >=20 > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:53:42AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > >=20 > > > > > >> From: Lee Jones > > > > > >> > > > > > >> There are currently two instances of the ios_handler being= used. > > > > > >> Both of which mearly toy with some regulator settings. Now= there > > > > > >> is a GPIO regulator API, we can use that instead, and less= en the > > > > > >> per platform burden. By doing this, we also become more De= vice > > > > > >> Tree compatible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Russell, > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is this patch in your tree with Ulf as the Author? > > > > >=20 > > > > > This is because of the way Russell's patch tracker works, it = sets > > > > > Author: to the name of the person using the patch tracker and > > > > > discards the From: field in the beginning of the patch which > > > > > git am will conversely respect. > > > >=20 > > > > Actually, the reverse. It does now respect the From: line, but= the > > > > From: line will be ignored for all notifications about the patc= h > > > > because the patch system was never built to parse the actual co= mments > > > > when sending out the email notifications. > > >=20 > > > So what do I have to do to reaffirm myself as the author? > >=20 > > I'd need to recommit the patch with the right information, which is= n't > > that easy to do. >=20 > Are you saying that you won't do it? :) >=20 > Is there anything I can do to make the process easier? Thinking about this a little more. Is it easier to remove it from your tree altogether? Only I have a small "ARM: ux500: " patch-set which directly relies on this patch. I could take it in via ARM-SoC without any fear of ordering issues. The alternative is for me to wait until this hits Mainline, or for you to take in the remainder of the patch-set via your patch tracker. The first option would be my preference. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:13:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: mmci: Move ios_handler functionality into the driver In-Reply-To: <20130122105608.GP6857@gmail.com> References: <1355495429-12510-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <1355495429-12510-3-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20130122090000.GH6857@gmail.com> <20130122100607.GH23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130122102010.GL6857@gmail.com> <20130122103723.GI23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130122105608.GP6857@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130123101349.GH15873@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:53:42AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> From: Lee Jones > > > > > >> > > > > > >> There are currently two instances of the ios_handler being used. > > > > > >> Both of which mearly toy with some regulator settings. Now there > > > > > >> is a GPIO regulator API, we can use that instead, and lessen the > > > > > >> per platform burden. By doing this, we also become more Device > > > > > >> Tree compatible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Russell, > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is this patch in your tree with Ulf as the Author? > > > > > > > > > > This is because of the way Russell's patch tracker works, it sets > > > > > Author: to the name of the person using the patch tracker and > > > > > discards the From: field in the beginning of the patch which > > > > > git am will conversely respect. > > > > > > > > Actually, the reverse. It does now respect the From: line, but the > > > > From: line will be ignored for all notifications about the patch > > > > because the patch system was never built to parse the actual comments > > > > when sending out the email notifications. > > > > > > So what do I have to do to reaffirm myself as the author? > > > > I'd need to recommit the patch with the right information, which isn't > > that easy to do. > > Are you saying that you won't do it? :) > > Is there anything I can do to make the process easier? Thinking about this a little more. Is it easier to remove it from your tree altogether? Only I have a small "ARM: ux500: " patch-set which directly relies on this patch. I could take it in via ARM-SoC without any fear of ordering issues. The alternative is for me to wait until this hits Mainline, or for you to take in the remainder of the patch-set via your patch tracker. The first option would be my preference. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog