From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] ext4: Simplify mpage_add_bh_to_extent() Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:06:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20130128180632.GJ22711@thunk.org> References: <1358510446-19174-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1358510446-19174-11-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:45894 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757682Ab3A1SGg (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:06:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358510446-19174-11-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:00:44PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > The argument b_size of mpage_add_bh_to_extent() was bogus since it was > always == blocksize (which we can easily derive from inode->i_blkbits). > Also second branch of condition: > if (nrblocks >= EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA) { > } else if ((nrblocks + (b_size >> mpd->inode->i_blkbits)) > > EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA) { > } > was never taken because (b_size >> mpd->inode->i_blkbits) == 1. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Thanks, applied. - Ted