From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: frto should not set snd_cwnd to 0 Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:01:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20130203.160113.1441940891060915058.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1359826377.30177.86.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1359918785.30177.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: ncardwell@google.com, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, pasik@iki.fi, hannes@stressinduktion.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ycheng@google.com To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:34426 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753746Ab3BCVBP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:01:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1359918785.30177.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Eric Dumazet Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:13:05 -0800 > From: Eric Dumazet >=20 > Commit 9dc274151a548 (tcp: fix ABC in tcp_slow_start()) > uncovered a bug in FRTO code : > tcp_process_frto() is setting snd_cwnd to 0 if the number > of in flight packets is 0. >=20 > As Neal pointed out, if no packet is in flight we lost our > chance to disambiguate whether a loss timeout was spurious. >=20 > We should assume it was a proper loss. >=20 > Reported-by: Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen > Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Applied.