From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.vapor.com ([83.220.149.2]:45192 "EHLO nitrogen.vapor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760833Ab3BIWdn (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:33:43 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:33:41 +0100 From: Ian Kumlien To: Sergei Trofimovich Cc: Ian Kumlien , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE before -D Message-ID: <20130209223341.GT15780@pomac.netswarm.net> References: <1360366221-22703-1-git-send-email-pomac@demius.net> <20130209210206.66e2b886@sf> <20130209185720.GR15780@pomac.netswarm.net> <20130210010626.487a8044@sf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130210010626.487a8044@sf> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:06:26AM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:57:20 +0100 > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100 > > > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > > > > > My builds are cluttered with: > > > > :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by > > > > default] > > > > > > > > Which makes it hard to tell if something breaks or not. > > > > > > > I don't know about you, but bilding with > > > > GCC 4.7.2 on gentoo, this is a issue. > > > > > > Unfortunately it's a gentoo specific gcc bug. I'd suggest reporting > > > it to bugs.gentoo.org. That -D by default breaks linux's perf as well > > > (due to -D_FOTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Werror in perf sources). > > > > Is it? There is a workaround in the android build system for compilers > > on ubuntu. > > > > Where can i find that bug report? > > I think you need to fill the new one. > > > This is not a emerge, this is a normal system build. > > Yeah, gentoo has patched gcc specs so you get -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > in gcc command line by default. > > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.6.0/gentoo/10_all_default-fortify-source.patch?view=markup Actually they don't patch the specs they patch the source. If they'd patched the specs i would have found it, i actually checked gcc -dumpspecs Again, is there any harm in adding this patch? Apparently other distors has done the same... > > > Current workaround is to pass AM_CFLAGS to make: > > > make AM_CFLAGS=stuff_w/o_fortify_source > > > It's what gentoo's live ebuild does. > > > > I can't see it here in the live ebuild... > > sys-fs/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs-9999.ebuild: > ... > src_compile() { > emake \ > CC="$(tc-getCC)" \ > AM_CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 \ > ... > } > > This line overrides in-Makefiles AM_CFLAGS. Must have changed recently... Was it changed on the 4:th, 5 days ago? > -- > > Sergei