From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755432Ab3BRMmw (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:42:52 -0500 Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:34607 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755350Ab3BRMmr (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:42:47 -0500 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v6 17/46] clockevents: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() in clockevents_notify() To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, walken@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20130218124042.26245.92242.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13021812-9574-0000-0000-000006A37B03 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The cpu idle code invokes clockevents_notify() during idle state transitions and the cpu offline code invokes it during the CPU_DYING phase. There seems to be a race-condition between the two, where the clockevents_lock never gets released, ending in a lockup. This can be fixed by synchronizing clockevents_notify() with CPU offline, by wrapping its contents within get/put_online_cpus_atomic(). Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- kernel/time/clockevents.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c index 30b6de0..ca340fd 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c +++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "tick-internal.h" @@ -431,6 +432,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) unsigned long flags; int cpu; + get_online_cpus_atomic(); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags); clockevents_do_notify(reason, arg); @@ -459,6 +461,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) break; } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clockevents_notify); #endif From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (e28smtp02.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp02.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15CA72C030B for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:42:45 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:09:38 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C939EE0050 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:13:36 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r1ICgacC36569160 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:12:36 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r1ICgcpm006021 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:42:40 +1100 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v6 17/46] clockevents: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() in clockevents_notify() To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20130218124042.26245.92242.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, walken@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , The cpu idle code invokes clockevents_notify() during idle state transitions and the cpu offline code invokes it during the CPU_DYING phase. There seems to be a race-condition between the two, where the clockevents_lock never gets released, ending in a lockup. This can be fixed by synchronizing clockevents_notify() with CPU offline, by wrapping its contents within get/put_online_cpus_atomic(). Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- kernel/time/clockevents.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c index 30b6de0..ca340fd 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c +++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "tick-internal.h" @@ -431,6 +432,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) unsigned long flags; int cpu; + get_online_cpus_atomic(); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags); clockevents_do_notify(reason, arg); @@ -459,6 +461,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) break; } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clockevents_notify); #endif From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Srivatsa S. Bhat) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:42 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v6 17/46] clockevents: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() in clockevents_notify() In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20130218124042.26245.92242.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The cpu idle code invokes clockevents_notify() during idle state transitions and the cpu offline code invokes it during the CPU_DYING phase. There seems to be a race-condition between the two, where the clockevents_lock never gets released, ending in a lockup. This can be fixed by synchronizing clockevents_notify() with CPU offline, by wrapping its contents within get/put_online_cpus_atomic(). Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- kernel/time/clockevents.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c index 30b6de0..ca340fd 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c +++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "tick-internal.h" @@ -431,6 +432,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) unsigned long flags; int cpu; + get_online_cpus_atomic(); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags); clockevents_do_notify(reason, arg); @@ -459,6 +461,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) break; } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clockevents_notify); #endif