From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755913Ab3BRMna (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:43:30 -0500 Received: from e28smtp07.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.7]:51137 "EHLO e28smtp07.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755742Ab3BRMnY (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:43:24 -0500 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v6 21/46] block: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, walken@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:11:10 +0530 Message-ID: <20130218124109.26245.27817.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13021812-8878-0000-0000-000005EFBACD Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- block/blk-softirq.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/blk-softirq.c b/block/blk-softirq.c index 467c8de..448f9a9 100644 --- a/block/blk-softirq.c +++ b/block/blk-softirq.c @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static void trigger_softirq(void *data) */ static int raise_blk_irq(int cpu, struct request *rq) { + get_online_cpus_atomic(); + if (cpu_online(cpu)) { struct call_single_data *data = &rq->csd; @@ -66,9 +68,11 @@ static int raise_blk_irq(int cpu, struct request *rq) data->flags = 0; __smp_call_function_single(cpu, data, 0); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); return 0; } + put_online_cpus_atomic(); return 1; } #else /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS */ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp07.in.ibm.com (e28smtp07.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp07.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF552C05E4 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:43:22 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:36 +0530 Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323B0E004F for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:14:05 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r1ICh67a30015578 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:13:06 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r1ICh6Io024360 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:43:08 +1100 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v6 21/46] block: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:11:10 +0530 Message-ID: <20130218124109.26245.27817.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, walken@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- block/blk-softirq.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/blk-softirq.c b/block/blk-softirq.c index 467c8de..448f9a9 100644 --- a/block/blk-softirq.c +++ b/block/blk-softirq.c @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static void trigger_softirq(void *data) */ static int raise_blk_irq(int cpu, struct request *rq) { + get_online_cpus_atomic(); + if (cpu_online(cpu)) { struct call_single_data *data = &rq->csd; @@ -66,9 +68,11 @@ static int raise_blk_irq(int cpu, struct request *rq) data->flags = 0; __smp_call_function_single(cpu, data, 0); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); return 0; } + put_online_cpus_atomic(); return 1; } #else /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS */ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Srivatsa S. Bhat) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:11:10 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v6 21/46] block: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20130218124109.26245.27817.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- block/blk-softirq.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/blk-softirq.c b/block/blk-softirq.c index 467c8de..448f9a9 100644 --- a/block/blk-softirq.c +++ b/block/blk-softirq.c @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static void trigger_softirq(void *data) */ static int raise_blk_irq(int cpu, struct request *rq) { + get_online_cpus_atomic(); + if (cpu_online(cpu)) { struct call_single_data *data = &rq->csd; @@ -66,9 +68,11 @@ static int raise_blk_irq(int cpu, struct request *rq) data->flags = 0; __smp_call_function_single(cpu, data, 0); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); return 0; } + put_online_cpus_atomic(); return 1; } #else /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS */