From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: there's no DSPSIZE register on gen4+ Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:29:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20130317202957.GM9021@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1362611003-4823-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> <1362611003-4823-7-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> <20130307093824.GS4469@intel.com> <20130315190411.GG17773@bwidawsk.net> <20130315190809.GH17773@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com (mail-ee0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F124E5C0E for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b57so2270369eek.18 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130315190809.GH17773@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:08:10PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:04:11PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:38:24AM +0200, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:03:13PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > = > > > > So don't read it when capturing the error state. This solves some > > > > "unclaimed register" messages on Haswell when we hang the GPU. > > > = > > > You're sure about gen4? I haven't really checked but my impression is > > > that gen4 is more like gen3, and gen4.5 more like gen5 as far as the > > > display is concerned (eg. gen4 would have the old video overlay, and > > > 4.5 would have video sprites). Can anyone confirm? > > = > > This register isn't anywhere in modern docs, what's up? > = > Ooops, inverted the logic in my head. If you make the check for gen <=3D6 > which I can lazily check with modern docs: > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky I've also checked vanilla gen4 docs and that offset is already marked as reserved, so we're good here. Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- = Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch