[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] cifs-utils: add 5.9] On 13.03.18 (Mon 19:36) Koen Kooi wrote: > > > Op 18 mrt. 2013 om 19:33 heeft Joe MacDonald het volgende geschreven: > > > Hey Koen, > > > > [[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] cifs-utils: add 5.9] On 13.03.18 (Mon 08:40) Koen Kooi wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > >> --- > >> meta-networking/recipes-support/cifs/cifs-utils_git.bb | 15 +++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-support/cifs/cifs-utils_git.bb > >> > >> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/cifs/cifs-utils_git.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-support/cifs/cifs-utils_git.bb > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..c78527e > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/cifs/cifs-utils_git.bb > >> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > >> +DESCRIPTION = "A a package of utilities for doing and managing mounts of the Linux CIFS filesystem." > >> +HOMEPAGE = "http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFS_utils" > >> + > >> +LICENSE = "GPLv3 && LGPLv3" > >> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504" > >> + > >> +PV = "5.9" > >> + > >> +SRCREV = "353d491dcb5d69d31434abeb962c8e9a49c36867" > >> +SRC_URI = "git://git.samba.org/cifs-utils.git" > >> + > >> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git" > >> + > >> +inherit autotools > >> + > > > > I had to make two changes to this recipe to address the following QA: > > > > WARNING: cifs-utils-5.9-r0: Failed to parse it's LICENSE field. > > WARNING: QA Issue: cifs-utils: Files/directories were installed but not shipped > > /usr/bin > > /usr/sbin > > > > First one's easy, I changed: > > > > +LICENSE = "GPLv3 && LGPLv3" > > > > to > > > > +LICENSE = "GPLv3 & LGPLv3" > > > > The second one I wasn't completely sure I was capturing what you > > intended to do with this, but I added this to the bottom of your recipe: > > > > +do_install_append() { > > + # Remove empty /usr/*bin directory since the mount helper is installed to /sbin > > + rmdir ${D}${bindir} ${D}${sbindir} > > +} > > > > This actually kind of seems like the wrong thing to do, but it also > > looks like cifs-utils don't care what sbindir and bindir point at. > > > > If you're okay with this, I'll merge the modified patch I have in tree > > now, or you can send an updated patch, whichever you prefer. > > Yes, thanks for fixing that! No problem. So, merged. Thanks. -- -Joe MacDonald. :wq