From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:36645 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756169Ab3CTMdQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:33:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm14so5205960wib.3 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 05:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:29:56 +0100 From: Karl Beldan To: Mahesh Palivela Cc: linux-wireless , Karl Beldan Subject: Re: [RFC V2 1/2] mac80211: Use a cfg80211_chan_def in ieee80211_hw_conf_chan Message-ID: <20130320122956.GA12516@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> (sfid-20130320_133320_776484_645BD439) References: <1363652600-23223-1-git-send-email-karl.beldan@gmail.com> <1363652600-23223-2-git-send-email-karl.beldan@gmail.com> <1363693626.3355.14.camel@WLAN-SW-TEST-03> <20130319122836.GA26078@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> <1363751176.9344.1.camel@WLAN-SW-TEST-03> <1363776796.9344.14.camel@WLAN-SW-TEST-03> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <1363776796.9344.14.camel@WLAN-SW-TEST-03> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:23:16PM +0530, Mahesh Palivela wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 09:16 +0530, Mahesh Palivela wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 13:28 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 05:17:06PM +0530, Mahesh Palivela wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 01:23 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote: > > > > > From: Karl Beldan > > > > > > > + local->_oper_chandef.center_freq1 += cfreq_off; > > > > > + local->_oper_chandef.center_freq2 += cfreq_off; > > > > > > > > can't add cfreq_off to center_freq2. Add only in case of non-zero > > > > center_freq2? > > > > > > > At first I was like "why ?", but I hadn't spotted the places where we > > > only check for "center_freq2 != 0". > > > > > > > > > Thanks Mahesh, Have you tested vht with this ? > > > > Not yet Karl. I will give it a try and update you. > > > > Karl, Is this patch based on mac80211-next kernel? I see failures/hunks > when apply your patch. > It is based on mac80211-next yes. I did it Sunday so it applies properly @ddbfe86 and does so up to 445ea4e^1, (445ea4e was Tuesday). Karl