From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756874Ab3CTSBd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:01:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:49742 "EHLO mail-ve0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752046Ab3CTSBc (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:01:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:01:26 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Lai Jiangshan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] workqueue: use rcu_read_lock_sched() instead for accessing pwq in RCU Message-ID: <20130320180126.GC29523@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1363721306-2030-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> <1363721306-2030-11-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363721306-2030-11-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:28:10AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > rcu_read_lock_sched() is better than preempt_disable() if the code is > protected by RCU_SCHED. > > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Applied to wq/for-3.10. Thanks. -- tejun