From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 55411] sysfs per-cpu cpufreq subdirs/symlinks screwed up after
s2ram
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:15:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <20130325111545.44FC411FB35@bugzilla.kernel.org>
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path:
In-Reply-To:
Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55411
--- Comment #37 from Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> 2013-03-25 11:15:44 ---
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:53:41 +0530
Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 March 2013 17:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Fixing Duncan's issues shouldn't be a very big deal now as i was
> > thinking too much about what was broken without my patches too. And
> > now that part is pretty clear.
>
> Hi Duncan,
>
> Try attached patch and this should take back your system to where it
> was.
>
> NOTE: With this patch your related_cpus wouldn't show any groups and
> related cpus must be same as affected cpus. All cpu*/cpufreq must be
> directories now and no symlinks.
FWIW, with this patch, pre-s2ram and post-resume are indeed consistent,
but it's not back to where it was.
With this patch, each core is a cpufreq law unto itself. Maybe that's
what you meant with the note, maybe not (I know the mapping of sysfs
files to cpufreq-info output was stated up-thread, but I lost track,
and how affected vs related maps to hardware vs software coordinated
and what it all actually means other than what I'm seeing isn't ideal,
is apparently a bit more than I'm able to keep in my head ATM), but it's
what I get. The relevant bits of cpufreq-info output:
analyzing CPU 0:
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
analyzing CPU 1:
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 1
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 1
analyzing CPU 2:
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 2
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 2
analyzing CPU 3:
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 3
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 3
analyzing CPU 4:
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 4
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 4
analyzing CPU 5:
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 5
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 5
But at least it's consistent: The same results both before and after a
suspend/resume cycle.
And given that 3.8 wasn't ideal either, maybe that's good enough for
this cycle, and a real fix will have to wait until the next commit
window and stable-tree. That'd give us more leeway to fix it right, as
well as a full cycle for testing anything else the "correct" fix might
dredge up.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.