From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53658)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kevin@koconnor.net>) id 1ULvhf-0008GH-UB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:20:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kevin@koconnor.net>) id 1ULvhc-0002V2-KF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:20:15 -0400
Received: from mail-ve0-f181.google.com ([209.85.128.181]:41271)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kevin@koconnor.net>) id 1ULvhc-0002Ut-Gc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:20:12 -0400
Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id pa12so1268262veb.40
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 06:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:20:09 -0400
From: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>
Message-ID: <20130330132009.GA12564@morn.localdomain>
References: <cover.1364541739.git.hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<1364545124-9781-1-git-send-email-hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20130329133310.GA9206@morn.localdomain>
	<51559BD8.5080502@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51559BD8.5080502@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v16] Add pvpanic device driver
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/03/2013 14:33, Kevin O'Connor ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:18:44PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> >> pvpanic device is used to notify host(qemu) when guest panic happens.
> > 
> > Thanks.  However, we're planning a move of ACPI tables from SeaBIOS to
> > QEMU.  I think this should wait until after the move.
> 
> The device should be in QEMU 1.5, and the SSDT probably will still be in
> SeaBIOS by then (and might even be the last to move, since it's quite
> complex and dynamic).  I don't think it is fair to block this patch on
> those grounds...

What is the user visible impact of not having a panic device?

My main concern is that the patch creates a new fw_cfg channel between
qemu and seabios thats sole purpose is to alter the OS visible ACPI
tables.  These types of QEMU->SeaBIOS interfaces are fragile and are
(in sum) quite complex.

-Kevin