From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762165Ab3DCLrb (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:47:31 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:58417 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756129Ab3DCLra (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:47:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:47:22 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Tejun Heo Cc: lkml , Jan Kara , Fengguang Wu , Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] writeback: convert writeback to unbound workqueue Message-ID: <20130403114722.GQ4667@kernel.dk> References: <20130402030933.GB6255@htj.dyndns.org> <20130402095353.GB4667@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 02 2013, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Jens. > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Thanks, pulled in for testing. We'll need the debug change in before > > sending this upstream, though. I agree with Jan/Dave that this is > > required functionality, for debugging purposes. > > Yeah, sure thing. The debug changes are targeting the coming merge > window but they'll have to go through -mm instead of block or > workqueue trees due to dependencies on arch changes. So, AFAICS, > while the routing is rather complicated, things should fall in place > in the same merge window. OK, that will work. Thanks, Tejun. -- Jens Axboe