From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <artagnon@gmail.com>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Duy Nguyễn" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:13:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409231332.GZ30308@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhajfqz8r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> And I think now I agree that indeed is a sensible assumption. I am
> not sure '-' is a good token for that, but I do not offhand think of
> a reason why '-' would be a _bad_ token for that, either.
Random idea: today you can do
git push origin master; # push branch master to remote origin
git push --multiple origin korg; # push default refspec to 2 remotes
How about:
git push origin korg -- master; # push master to 2 remotes
git push -- master next; # push two refs to default remote
git push origin -- master; # push master to origin, more explicitly
git push origin korg --; # push default refspec to 2 remotes, again
git push host:some/path; # ambiguous argument. Please disambiguate.
git push host:some/path --; # push default refspec over SSH
git push -- host:some/path; # push specified refspec to default remote
git push origin; # is a remote name and not a refname. Good.
git push master; # is a ref name and not a remote name. Good.
What do you think?
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 16:58 [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 17:08 ` Jeff King
2013-03-19 9:58 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-19 10:02 ` Jeff King
2013-03-19 11:33 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-03-19 11:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-19 12:15 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-03-19 13:03 ` Holger Hellmuth (IKS)
2013-03-19 11:58 ` Holger Hellmuth (IKS)
2013-03-19 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-19 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 11:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 17:39 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 18:03 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 18:08 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 19:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 23:13 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2013-04-09 23:14 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 1:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 4:13 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 17:27 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 18:59 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 19:31 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 19:33 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 19:52 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:21 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:41 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:32 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 19:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 20:11 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 21:23 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 20:05 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:19 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:24 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:55 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:04 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 21:11 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:18 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 21:23 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 21:42 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:56 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 22:06 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 22:16 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 22:11 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 22:23 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 22:31 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-11 7:38 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-11 7:45 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-11 21:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-13 5:07 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 21:15 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-12 22:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 3:50 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 13:22 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 15:56 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 17:29 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 13:19 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130409231332.GZ30308@google.com \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.