From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:12:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] cpufreq: sh: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq Message-Id: <20130410021236.GK11105@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <3167220d1e262ff22078993a5beec55e82dfd951.1365079581.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20130409125509.GH15412@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Viresh Kumar Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, Paul Mundt , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:42:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq. > > > > Why? > > > > I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies. > > Hi Simon, > > The idea was to keep all cpufreq drivers at a common and most suitable > place, so that future consolidation work can be done easily and efficiently. > > So, functionally this patch shouldn't change anything. Thanks, I understand. I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935232Ab3DJCMl (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 22:12:41 -0400 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:39414 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765597Ab3DJCMj (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 22:12:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:12:36 +0900 From: Simon Horman To: Viresh Kumar Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, Paul Mundt , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] cpufreq: sh: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq Message-ID: <20130410021236.GK11105@verge.net.au> References: <3167220d1e262ff22078993a5beec55e82dfd951.1365079581.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20130409125509.GH15412@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organisation: Horms Solutions Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:42:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq. > > > > Why? > > > > I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies. > > Hi Simon, > > The idea was to keep all cpufreq drivers at a common and most suitable > place, so that future consolidation work can be done easily and efficiently. > > So, functionally this patch shouldn't change anything. Thanks, I understand. I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.