From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965205Ab3DJLCs (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:02:48 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:49380 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965013Ab3DJLCr (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:02:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:02:27 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Kukjin Kim Cc: "'Doug Anderson'" , "'Simon Glass'" , "'Naveen Krishna Chatradhi'" , grant.likely@secretlab.ca, yuvaraj.cd@gmail.com, ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org, bhushan.r@samsung.com, sreekumar.c@samsung.com, prashanth.g@samsung.com, olof@lixom.net, djkurtz@chromium.org, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, linux@roeck-us.net, "'Russell King'" , "'Thomas Abraham'" , "'Rahul Sharma'" , "'Jingoo Han'" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: dts: Add i2c-arbitrator bus for exynos5250-snow Message-ID: <20130410110226.GA3533@the-dreams.de> References: <1363192583-26363-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <1365543270-10736-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <1365543270-10736-2-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <310301ce35da$724dff60$56e9fe20$%kim@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <310301ce35da$724dff60$56e9fe20$%kim@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:59:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Doug Anderson wrote: > > > > We need to use the i2c-arbitrator to talk to any of the devices on i2c > > bus 4 on exynos5250-snow so that we don't confuse the embedded > > controller (EC). Add the i2c-arbitrator to the device tree. As we > > add future devices (keyboard, sbs, tps65090) we'll add them on top of > > this. > > > > The arbitrated bus is numbered 104 simply as a convenience to make it > > easier for people poking around to guess that it might have something > > to do with the physical bus 4. > > > > The addition is split between the cros5250-common and the snow device > > tree file since not all cros5250-class devices use arbitration. > > > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson > > I'm fine on 2nd and 3rd patches. Shall I take only two patches without 1st > one in samsung tree? Please wait for my OK on patch 1. Or ack patches 2 and 3 and I will pick them up. I am fine with both. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:02:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: dts: Add i2c-arbitrator bus for exynos5250-snow In-Reply-To: <310301ce35da$724dff60$56e9fe20$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1363192583-26363-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <1365543270-10736-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <1365543270-10736-2-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <310301ce35da$724dff60$56e9fe20$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20130410110226.GA3533@the-dreams.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:59:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Doug Anderson wrote: > > > > We need to use the i2c-arbitrator to talk to any of the devices on i2c > > bus 4 on exynos5250-snow so that we don't confuse the embedded > > controller (EC). Add the i2c-arbitrator to the device tree. As we > > add future devices (keyboard, sbs, tps65090) we'll add them on top of > > this. > > > > The arbitrated bus is numbered 104 simply as a convenience to make it > > easier for people poking around to guess that it might have something > > to do with the physical bus 4. > > > > The addition is split between the cros5250-common and the snow device > > tree file since not all cros5250-class devices use arbitration. > > > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson > > I'm fine on 2nd and 3rd patches. Shall I take only two patches without 1st > one in samsung tree? Please wait for my OK on patch 1. Or ack patches 2 and 3 and I will pick them up. I am fine with both.