From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936478Ab3DKVXP (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:23:15 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:41842 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935400Ab3DKVXJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:23:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:23:08 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Lai Jiangshan , "Paul E. McKenney" , Stephen Hemminger , Davide Libenzi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Linux kernel Wait-Free Concurrent Queue Implementation Message-ID: <20130411212308.GA21778@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20130311213602.GB9829@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130311213602.GB9829@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > It is provided as a starting point only. Test cases should be ported > from Userspace RCU to kernel space and thoroughly ran on a wide range of > architectures before considering this port production-ready. Hi Mathieu, any progress on this front? I'm not sure how to approach test cases in the kernel, perhaps taking hints from locking_selftest() would be a start. Fwiw, I've been running wfcqueue+epoll for a few weeks now on my personal machines without problems :)