From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2013, #05; Mon, 15) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:44:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20130418214427.GA10119@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vk3o1f5kb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwqs1dnxp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130417201056.GA2914@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7va9owd3d1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130418172714.GA24690@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vd2tr6833.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130418180017.GA5714@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v61zj66wu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130418203035.GB24690@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vvc7j4j0u.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Thomas Rast , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 18 23:44:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1USwd9-0005sh-VF for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:44:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936380Ab3DRVob (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:44:31 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:43548 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936039Ab3DRVob (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:44:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 19020 invoked by uid 102); 18 Apr 2013 21:44:35 -0000 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (75.15.5.89) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:44:35 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:44:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vvc7j4j0u.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:37:53PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Because this is to help people who are _used_ to seeing "git add" > not take the removals into account, I doubt that "Did I want those > updated or not? Let me see the details of them." will be the > question they will be asking [*1*]. > > I dunno. > > > [Footnote] > > *1* "I know I didn't want to include these removals to the index, > but I learned today that in later Git I should make myself more > clear if I want to keep doing so; thanks for letting me know.", or > "I've long been assuming that I have to say 'git add' and 'git rm' > separately, but I learned today that I can say 'add --all', and in > later Git I do not even have to; thanks for letting me know." are > the two reactions I expected. I am expecting a reaction more like "Hmm, I never thought about it before. Does that make sense to me or not? Let me think about which paths it pertains to and decide". Which I admit is no more likely than the scenarios you outlined, but it is close to what I thought the first time I saw the warning. -Peff