From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:51:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20130422155147.GA7018@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <51709FD7.8050408@gmail.com> <1366417746-24990-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20130422153408.GD3791@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Russell King , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arm@kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic > >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an > >> arm64 compiler. > >> > >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in > >> at the same time. > >> > >> Stephen Boyd (4): > >> ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member > >> ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier > >> ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock > >> ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64() > >> > >> arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h | 5 +- > >> arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c | 14 +---- > >> arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > >> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able > > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree > > this series was based on. > > > > What do I need to use as the base for this series? > > These are based on next-20130419. Cheers! Mark. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754535Ab3DVPwO (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:52:14 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:63283 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750934Ab3DVPwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:52:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:51:47 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Rob Herring , Russell King , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arm@kernel.org" , John Stultz , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 Message-ID: <20130422155147.GA7018@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <51709FD7.8050408@gmail.com> <1366417746-24990-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20130422153408.GD3791@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic > >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an > >> arm64 compiler. > >> > >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in > >> at the same time. > >> > >> Stephen Boyd (4): > >> ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member > >> ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier > >> ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock > >> ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64() > >> > >> arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h | 5 +- > >> arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c | 14 +---- > >> arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > >> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able > > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree > > this series was based on. > > > > What do I need to use as the base for this series? > > These are based on next-20130419. Cheers! Mark. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:51:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 In-Reply-To: <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org> References: <51709FD7.8050408@gmail.com> <1366417746-24990-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20130422153408.GD3791@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20130422155147.GA7018@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic > >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an > >> arm64 compiler. > >> > >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in > >> at the same time. > >> > >> Stephen Boyd (4): > >> ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member > >> ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier > >> ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock > >> ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64() > >> > >> arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h | 5 +- > >> arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c | 14 +---- > >> arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > >> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able > > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree > > this series was based on. > > > > What do I need to use as the base for this series? > > These are based on next-20130419. Cheers! Mark.