From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752488Ab3EVHHw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 03:07:52 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:33709 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751065Ab3EVHHt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 03:07:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20130522.000748.454683591881350280.davem@davemloft.net> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dborkman@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nschichan@freebox.fr Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20130521130438.1ecdf535ab2461888abbe0c3@linux-foundation.org> References: <20130521142948.444f09820c5406f9adc4b7f1@canb.auug.org.au> <20130521130438.1ecdf535ab2461888abbe0c3@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:38 -0700 > Nicolas, I think the patches need a re-check so I'll drop the versions > which I presently have. Please refresh, retest and resend when > convenient? It'll need to be against linux-next, which is where the > conflicting (vfree/module_free) changes have occurred. How about working against net-next and submitting your patches to netdev just like the rest of the world? There is zero reason for these changes to go through Andrew's tree.